Digestery
Lifestyle practices › Sauna and the Heart

Does sauna use lower heart disease risk?

Updated Nov 14, 2026 · 41 papers read from PubMed abstracts · 21 on topic

Under review. A person has not yet checked this short answer against the sources. Until they do, search engines are asked not to list this page. See the 14 open items

Short answer

Possibly, but not proven in trials.

Finnish men who used saunas more often had fewer heart deaths and less new high blood pressure, but that is a link. Small, short trials give mixed blood pressure results.

Confidence

Low

What “low” means

This page says what the research shows. It does not say whether you should use a sauna.

Where the evidence stands

Each dot is one on-topic paper. Steps near the top answer the question more directly. Select a dot to see the study.

↑ Stronger evidence

  1. Trials in people: heart disease, blood pressure and death

    Trials that measured heart disease, blood pressure and death directly.

    3

    3 benefit

  2. Trials in people: other measures

    Trials that measured other health or performance measures.

    2

    1 benefit, 1 no difference

  3. Trials in people: lab tests or safety

    Trials that measured lab tests, side effects or safety.

    5

    2 benefit, 1 mixed, 2 no difference

  4. Population studies

    Studies that followed or surveyed groups of people. They show links, not causes.

    4

    4 benefit

  5. Blood levels and genes

    Studies that link blood levels or genes to health.

    0

    None among the papers we read.

↓ Weaker evidence

  • Points to benefit
  • Mixed
  • No difference
  • No direction
  • Points to harm

Not on the ladder: 5 reviews of many studies (shown below), 2 opinion or narrative papers. Counts are papers, not people. Some studies appear in more than one paper.

See every study

What we found

  • Among 2315 Finnish men tracked 20.7 years, those taking saunas 4 to 7 times weekly, versus once, had under half the risk of sudden heart death (hazard ratio 0.37). Laukkanen 2015
  • In the same Finnish study, 1,621 men without high blood pressure who took saunas 4 to 7 times weekly had about half the risk of developing it (hazard ratio 0.54). Zaccardi 2017
  • In a trial of 47 inactive adults, adding a 15-minute sauna after exercise for 8 weeks lowered systolic (top-number) blood pressure by 8.0 mmHg more than exercise alone. Lee 2022
  • In a trial in forty-one adults with narrowed heart arteries, 8 weeks of Finnish sauna 4 times a week did not change blood pressure versus no sauna. Debray 2023

What the research says

Finnish cohort links frequent sauna to fewer deaths

One long-running study of men in eastern Finland supplied all the population data. Men who took saunas more often had fewer sudden heart deaths, fatal heart disease and deaths from any cause, and longer sessions also tracked with lower heart death risk.

Two later papers from the same cohort, with 2575 men, found 3 to 7 sessions a week, versus 2 or fewer, linked to lower death from any cause (hazard ratio 0.86). These show links, not causes.

Studies: Laukkanen 2015, Zaccardi 2017, Kunutsor 2022, Kunutsor 2024

Blood pressure: reviews and trials disagree

Two pooled reviews found lower blood pressure. One found systolic pressure fell 5.26 mmHg after 2 to 4 weeks of sauna. Another, of heat therapy in general, found a fall of 3.94 mmHg; its abstract does not say how many studies used saunas.

Other results disagree. A heart failure review found no clear effect of infrared sauna on blood pressure. Among trials, sauna after exercise lowered systolic pressure 8.0 mmHg more than exercise alone in 47 adults, but 8 weeks of Finnish sauna did not change it in forty-one heart patients.

Studies: Li 2020, Pizzey 2021, Källström 2018, Lee 2022, Debray 2023

Heart failure: short sauna courses improved heart measures

Most trials tested Waon therapy, a 60°C far-infrared dry sauna, in heart failure patients for 10 days to 4 weeks. In 188 patients, 2 weeks of sauna raised the heart's pumping share and lowered BNP, a blood marker of heart strain; controls did not change.

In the multicenter WAON-CHF trial (76 sauna, 73 control patients), the main measure, BNP, did not clearly change, though symptom class, 6-minute walk and heart size improved. A review pooling seven studies found BNP and pumping improved over 2 to 4 weeks.

Studies: Miyata 2008, Tei 2016, Källström 2018, Fujita 2011, Kuwahata 2011

One small study tracked heart failure events

In 129 patients with severe heart failure, those given Waon sauna at least twice a week had heart failure events or heart death in 31.3%, versus 68.7% of matched patients on usual care, over 60 months.

Patients were matched, not randomly assigned, so the groups may have differed in other ways. A heat therapy review reported the same 31.3% figure among 65 patients, so it may not be separate evidence.

Studies: Kihara 2009, Ye 2020

What reviews of many studies found

Reviews pool or sum up earlier studies. They are not on the ladder, because they repeat studies already counted there.

  • Pooled review (meta-analysis) · Källström 2018

    Searched for controlled studies of sauna in heart failure; nine qualified, all infrared sauna, and seven were pooled. Over 2 to 4 weeks, BNP and heart size fell and pumping improved; blood pressure did not clearly change.

  • Pooled review (meta-analysis) · Li 2020

    Summarized sixteen sauna articles. Right after a sauna, systolic pressure fell 5.55 mmHg; after 2 to 4 weeks it was 5.26 mmHg lower and heart pumping (LVEF) rose 3.27%. Authors concluded sauna helps heart function, most in weak hearts.

  • Pooled review (meta-analysis) · Pizzey 2021

    Pooled 15 heat therapy studies (type not named) in healthy and sick people. Heat lowered systolic pressure by 3.94 mmHg and diastolic by 3.88 mmHg; resting heart rate did not change. Certainty was rated moderate.

  • Pooled review (meta-analysis) · Ye 2020

    Pooled heat therapy studies in heart failure: sixteen studies on 506 patients showed pumping (LVEF) up 4.4%, and blood pressure fell in 431 patients of 15 studies. The authors called mild heat an effective add-on therapy.

How the research grew

The papers we read span 1983 to 2026. 2 of the 21 on-topic papers came out in 2024 to 2026. The earliest trial in people here is from 1983.

Trials in people
Population studies
Reviews
Opinion
1980–84
1985–89
1990–94
1995–99
2000–04
2005–09
2010–14
2015–19
2020–24
2025–26
  1. 1980–84
    Trials in people
  2. 2005–09
    Trials in people
  3. 2010–14
    Trials in people
  4. 2015–19
    Trials in peoplePopulation studiesReviews
  5. 2020–24
    Trials in peoplePopulation studiesReviewsOpinion
  6. 2025–26
    Opinion

Each dot is one on-topic paper, colored by what it found. Rings mark key papers:

  1. 1983. Early trial: sauna series lowered resting blood pressure. Winterfeld 1983
  2. 2008. Randomized study of 188 heart failure patients. Miyata 2008
  3. 2009. Five-year follow-up: fewer heart failure events with Waon. Kihara 2009
  4. 2015. Finnish cohort links frequent sauna to fewer heart deaths. Laukkanen 2015
  5. 2023. Finnish sauna trial in heart patients: no vascular gains. Debray 2023

Who was studied

Who took part, and how many. The largest trial here had 188 people; the largest population study had 2,575.

  1. Trials in people
  2. 188 people · Miyata 2008
    people with chronic heart failure on standard treatment
  3. 150 people · Ichiki 2017
    people with chronic heart failure
  4. 149 people · Tei 2016
    hospitalized people with advanced heart failure
  5. 129 people · Kihara 2009
    people with severe chronic heart failure
  6. 54 people · Kuwahata 2011
    people with chronic heart failure on usual treatment
  7. 47 people · Lee 2022
    inactive adults aged about 49 with at least one heart disease risk factor
  8. 41 people · Debray 2023
    adults aged about 62 with stable coronary artery disease
  9. 40 people · Fujita 2011
    people with chronic heart failure, plus heart-disease hamsters
  10. 19 people · Kominami 2020
    healthy young men
  11. Population, blood and gene studies
  12. 2,575 people · Kunutsor 2024
    Finnish men aged 42 to 61
  13. 2,575 people · Kunutsor 2022
    Finnish men aged 42 to 61
  14. 2,315 people · Laukkanen 2015
    middle-aged men from Eastern Finland aged 42-60
  15. 1,621 people · Zaccardi 2017
    middle-aged men from Eastern Finland aged 42-60 without high blood pressure at the start
  16. People in the study, log scale
    1101001,00010,000
  • Points to benefit
  • Mixed
  • No difference
  • No direction
  • Points to harm

Bars use a log scale: each step is ten times more people. Reviews, animal studies and papers with no count in the abstract are not shown.

Who funds this research

None of the 10 relevant trial papers shows a company stake. Only one, the sauna-plus-exercise trial, declares no conflicts; the other nine have no disclosure in PubMed. This did not change the confidence.

  • No disclosure in PubMed 9
  • No stake declared 1

Funding rule. A stake is always shown. Confidence is lowered only when every supporting study comes from a party with a stake. "No disclosure in PubMed" means the PubMed record has no conflict-of-interest statement. It does not mean there is no conflict.

All 21 on-topic papers

Each paper shows what it tested, what it found, and who has a stake. Every paper also has its own page that explains how much it counts and how it fits. See every study as a list.

  1. Randomized trial · measured the question itselfLee et al., 2022American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · PubMed

    Effects of regular sauna bathing in conjunction with exercise on cardiovascular function: a multi-arm, randomized controlled trial.

    47 people · inactive adults aged about 49 with at least one heart disease risk factor

    Tested8 weeks of exercise plus a 15-minute sauna after each session, vs exercise alone, vs no change in routine

    Exercise plus sauna gave lower systolic blood pressure (-8.0 mmHg; 95% CI, -14.6 to -1.4 mmHg) and better fitness (+2.7 mL/kg/min) than exercise alone. Exercise alone did not change blood pressure vs control.

    Points to benefitNo stake declaredAbstract only

    No competing interests declared.

    Read the study page

  2. Trial, not randomized · measured the question itselfKihara et al., 2009Journal of cardiology · PubMed

    Waon therapy improves the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure.

    129 people · people with severe chronic heart failure

    TestedFar infrared dry sauna at 60 degrees C for 15 min, daily for 5 days then at least twice a week, vs usual heart failure care, followed 5 years

    Heart failure events or heart death happened in 68.7% of the control group but only 31.3% of the sauna group (P<0.01) at 60 months. 12 control and 8 sauna patients died.

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  3. Trial, not randomized · measured the question itselfWinterfeld et al., 1983Zeitschrift fur die gesamte innere Medizin und ihre Grenzgebiete · PubMed

    [Effect of sauna and walking series on blood pressure, peripheral microcirculation and performance behavior in essential hypertension].

    people with mild to moderate high blood pressure already taking propranolol

    TestedSauna baths over several weeks, vs a running series

    Both sauna baths and running lowered blood pressure at rest and improved blood flow in the muscles. Under heavier exercise load, blood pressure was not changed by either method.

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  4. Randomized trial · other health measuresDebray et al., 2023Journal of applied physiology · PubMed

    Finnish sauna bathing and vascular health of adults with coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.

    41 people · adults aged about 62 with stable coronary artery disease

    TestedFinnish sauna 4 times a week, 20-30 min each, at 79°C, for 8 weeks, vs keeping usual lifestyle

    Artery widening (FMD) did not differ: control 0.07% vs sauna 0.15% (interaction P = 0.909). Systolic (P = 0.951) and diastolic (P = 0.292) blood pressure did not differ between groups.

    No differenceNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  5. Randomized trial · other health measuresMiyata et al., 2008Journal of cardiology · PubMed

    Beneficial effects of Waon therapy on patients with chronic heart failure: results of a prospective multicenter study.

    188 people · people with chronic heart failure on standard treatment

    TestedFar infrared dry sauna at 60 degrees C for 15 min daily for 2 weeks, then rest, vs standard treatment alone

    Ejection fraction rose from 31.6+/-10.4% to 34.6+/-10.6% (p<0.0001) with sauna but not in controls. BNP fell from 542+/-508 pg/ml to 394+/-410 pg/ml (p<0.001); not in controls.

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  6. Randomized trial · lab tests or safetyKominami et al., 2020International journal of hyperthermia · PubMed

    Cardiovascular reactions for whole-body thermal therapy with a hot pack and Waon therapy.

    19 people · healthy young men

    TestedOne session of dry sauna (Waon) and one of whole-body hot packs, each followed by rest, compared in the same men

    Blood pressure did not change significantly after either therapy. Brachial artery widened equally (HPTT: 3.70 ± 0.57 ⇒ 4.05 ± 0.59 mm; WT: 3.63 ± 0.63 ⇒ 3.93 ± 0.61 mm).

    No differenceNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  7. Trial, not randomized · lab tests or safetyIchiki et al., 2017Circulation journal · PubMed

    Neurohumoral Modulation During Waon Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure - Subanalysis of Waon-CHF Study.

    150 people · people with chronic heart failure

    TestedWaon therapy (dry far infrared sauna) vs usual care, with blood hormone levels checked

    Heart-related blood hormones BNP, Aldo and CNP were not statistically different between sauna and control groups, although clinical measures improved. Some subgroups on certain heart drugs did better in the sauna group.

    No differenceNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  8. Randomized trial · lab tests or safetyTei et al., 2016Circulation journal · PubMed

    Waon Therapy for Managing Chronic Heart Failure - Results From a Multicenter Prospective Randomized WAON-CHF Study.

    149 people · hospitalized people with advanced heart failure

    TestedFar infrared dry sauna at 60℃ for 15 min once a day for 10 days, then 30 min bed rest, vs usual care

    The main measure, BNP (a heart strain blood marker), did not reach statistical significance. Heart failure class, 6-min walk distance and heart size ratio improved only in the sauna group. No serious adverse events.

    MixedNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  9. Randomized trial · lab tests or safetyFujita et al., 2011Circulation journal · PubMed

    Effect of Waon therapy on oxidative stress in chronic heart failure.

    40 people · people with chronic heart failure, plus heart-disease hamsters

    TestedDaily far infrared dry sauna at 60°C for 4 weeks vs usual care alone

    BNP fell from 402±221 to 225±137pg/ml (P<0.001) in the sauna group and did not change in controls. Hydroperoxide, a stress marker, fell from 422±116 to 327±88U.CARR. Hamster tests found less heart stress too.

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  10. Randomized trial · lab tests or safetyKuwahata et al., 2011Journal of cardiology · PubMed

    Improvement of autonomic nervous activity by Waon therapy in patients with chronic heart failure.

    54 people · people with chronic heart failure on usual treatment

    TestedWaon therapy (dry sauna) plus usual treatment for 4 weeks, vs usual treatment alone

    Among 27 sauna patients, cardiac output and ejection fraction rose after 4 weeks but did not change in 27 control patients. Heart rate variability moved toward calmer nerve activity only in the sauna group.

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  11. Population study: followed a groupKunutsor et al., 2024Scandinavian cardiovascular journal · PubMed

    Sauna bathing and mortality risk: unraveling the interaction with systolic blood pressure in a cohort of Finnish men.

    2,575 people · Finnish men aged 42 to 61

    TestedSauna use (low: 2 or fewer sessions a week vs high: 3-7 a week) and blood pressure level, followed a median 27.8 years

    Low vs high sauna use was linked to 16% higher death risk (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.31). High blood pressure with low sauna use: HR 1.47 (1.24-1.74). High blood pressure with high sauna use: HR 1.24 (0.98-1.57).

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  12. Population study: followed a groupKunutsor et al., 2022European journal of epidemiology · PubMed

    Inflammation, sauna bathing, and all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Finnish men: a cohort study.

    2,575 people · Finnish men aged 42 to 61

    TestedSauna use (low: 2 or fewer sessions a week vs high: 3-7 a week) and a blood marker of inflammation, followed a median 27.8 years

    High vs low sauna use: HR 0.86 (0.76-0.97) for all-cause death. High inflammation with low sauna use: 1.28 (1.12-1.47). High inflammation with high sauna use: 1.06 (0.81-1.40), no clear link.

    Points to benefitNo stake declaredAbstract only

    No competing interests declared.

    Read the study page

  13. Population study: followed a groupZaccardi et al., 2017American journal of hypertension · PubMed

    Sauna Bathing and Incident Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Study.

    1,621 people · middle-aged men from Eastern Finland aged 42-60 without high blood pressure at the start

    TestedHow often men took saunas (1, 2-3, or 4-7 times a week), followed for a median 24.7 years

    Compared with 1 sauna a week, the hazard ratio for new high blood pressure was 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.57-1.02) for 2 to 3 and 0.54 (0.32-0.91) for 4 to 7 sessions. After more adjustment: 0.83 (0.59-1.18) and 0.53 (0.28-0.98).

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  14. Population study: followed a groupLaukkanen et al., 2015JAMA internal medicine · PubMed

    Association between sauna bathing and fatal cardiovascular and all-cause mortality events.

    2,315 people · middle-aged men from Eastern Finland aged 42-60

    TestedHow often men took saunas (1, 2-3, or 4-7 times a week) and how long, followed for about 20.7 years

    Compared with 1 sauna a week, the hazard ratio of sudden cardiac death was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.57-1.07) for 2 to 3 and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.18-0.75) for 4 to 7 sessions per week. Similar links for heart disease and all-cause death.

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  15. Pooled review (meta-analysis)Pizzey et al., 2021Experimental physiology · PubMed

    The effect of heat therapy on blood pressure and peripheral vascular function: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    15 studies · healthy people and people with health conditions

    TestedHeat therapy for 30-90 minutes, over 10-36 sessions, vs control

    Heat therapy lowered systolic blood pressure (MD: -3.94 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.22, -0.67) and diastolic (MD: -3.88 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.13, -1.63). Resting heart rate did not change (MD: -1.25 beats/min).

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  16. Pooled review (meta-analysis)Li et al., 2020European journal of cardiovascular nursing · PubMed

    Acute and short-term efficacy of sauna treatment on cardiovascular function: A meta-analysis.

    16 studies · people in sauna studies, including people with weak heart function

    TestedSauna right after a session (0-30 min) and sauna treatment for 2 to 4 weeks, vs before or no sauna

    Right after a sauna, systolic blood pressure fell 5.55 mmHg and diastolic 6.50 mmHg. After 2 to 4 weeks, systolic fell 5.26 mmHg and diastolic 4.14 mmHg. Pumping strength (LVEF) rose 3.27%.

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  17. Pooled review (meta-analysis)Ye et al., 2020Artificial organs · PubMed

    Can heat therapy help patients with heart failure?

    people with heart failure

    TestedThermal therapy that raises body temperature by up to 1.4°C, vs no therapy

    Sixteen studies on 506 patients showed LVEF up 4.4%. Blood pressure fell in 431 patients of 15 studies. Among 65 patients, thermal therapy reduced cardiac death and rehospitalization by 31.3%.

    Points to benefitNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed; funders include a heart institute and public research councils.

    Read the study page

  18. Pooled review (meta-analysis)Källström et al., 2018Clinical cardiology · PubMed

    Effects of sauna bath on heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    9 studies · people with heart failure

    TestedInfrared sauna at 60°C for 15 minutes, 5 times a week for 2 to 4 weeks, vs no sauna

    Infrared sauna was linked to lower BNP (a heart strain blood marker), smaller heart size ratio and better ejection fraction. There was no effect on systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Only infrared saunas qualified.

    MixedNo stake declaredAbstract only

    No competing interests declared.

    Read the study page

  19. Systematic reviewRocha Conceição et al., 2018Journal of cardiac failure · PubMed

    Effect of Waon Therapy in Individuals With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.

    people with heart failure

    TestedWaon therapy (a gentle dry-heat sauna treatment)

    No abstract in PubMed.

    No directionNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

  20. Opinion or narrative reviewNagai et al., 2026International journal of environmental research and public health · PubMed

    Effects of Bathtub Bathing and Sauna Practices on Cardiovascular and Systemic Health: A Narrative Review.

    adults in studies of hot bathtub bathing or sauna

    TestedReview of studies on habitual bathtub bathing (17 studies) and sauna use (28 studies)

    Sauna bathing, studied mostly in Finnish cohorts, was linked to lower heart disease and all-cause death, and better inflammation and artery-lining markers. Bathtub evidence was limited to observational studies of markers. The authors call for studies with clear clinical endpoints.

    No weight on the ladderNo stake declaredAbstract only

    No competing interests declared.

    Read the study page

  21. Opinion or narrative reviewPatrick et al., 2021Experimental gerontology · PubMed

    Sauna use as a lifestyle practice to extend healthspan.

    general adult populations (review of sauna research)

    TestedOverview of sauna use at 45 °C to 100 °C and its effects on the body

    The authors describe large Finnish cohort studies linking sauna use to lower illness and death risk, in a dose-dependent way. No new data or numbers are given in the abstract.

    No weight on the ladderNo disclosure in PubMedAbstract only

    No disclosure in PubMed.

    Read the study page

20 papers we read and set aside as off topic
  1. Ferreira et al., 2023. Cardiovascular autonomic modulation during passive heating protocols: a systematic review. (systematic review)
  2. Mao et al., 2023. Associations between extreme temperature exposure and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (pooled review (meta-analysis))
  3. Goodall et al., 2020. A Narrative Review of the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Ulceration. (systematic review)
  4. Harwood et al., 2021. A systematic review of the role of heat therapy for patients with intermittent claudication due to peripheral artery disease. (systematic review)
  5. Sebők et al., 2021. Heat therapy shows benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (pooled review (meta-analysis))
  6. Lee et al., 2025. Regular postexercise sauna bathing does not improve heart rate variability: A multi-arm randomized controlled trial. (randomized trial)
  7. Okamoto et al., 2021. Local Passive Heat for the Treatment of Hypertension in Autonomic Failure. (randomized trial)
  8. Greaney et al., 2015. Impairments in central cardiovascular function contribute to attenuated reflex vasodilation in aged skin. (randomized trial)
  9. Akerman et al., 2019. Heat therapy vs. supervised exercise therapy for peripheral arterial disease: a 12-wk randomized, controlled trial. (randomized trial)
  10. Brunt et al., 2016. Passive heat therapy improves endothelial function, arterial stiffness and blood pressure in sedentary humans. (trial, not randomized)
  11. Chavez et al., 2026. Acute effects of passive heat exposure on vascular function and exercise capacity in patients with chronic kidney disease. (randomized trial)
  12. Ro et al., 2025. Feasibility of unsupervised, home-based leg heat therapy in older adults: a pilot, sham-controlled trial. (randomized trial)
  13. Beever, 2010. The effects of repeated thermal therapy on quality of life in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. (trial, not randomized)
  14. Youngstedt et al., 1993. Does body temperature mediate anxiolytic effects of acute exercise? (randomized trial)
  15. Kaiser et al., 2025. No effect of either heat therapy or aerobic exercise training on blood pressure in adults with untreated hypertension: a randomized clinical trial. (randomized trial)
  16. Hartard et al., 2025. Influence of heat therapy and/or vibration on nonspecific back pain: A prospective, open, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical study. (randomized trial)
  17. Périard et al., 2011. Central and peripheral fatigue during passive and exercise-induced hyperthermia. (randomized trial)
  18. Brunelle et al., 2024. Evidence-based recommendations regarding risk reduction practices for people at risk of or with breast cancer-related lymphedema: consensus from an expert panel. (other)
  19. Laukkanen et al., 2017. Sauna bathing is inversely associated with dementia and Alzheimer's disease in middle-aged Finnish men. (population study: followed a group)
  20. Kunutsor et al., 2018. Sauna bathing reduces the risk of stroke in Finnish men and women: A prospective cohort study. (population study: followed a group)

Words on this page

Hazard ratio (HR)
Compares how often something happened in two groups over time. 1 means no difference. 0.80 means 20% lower risk; 1.20 means 20% higher.
95% CI (confidence interval)
The range where the true result likely lies. If the range includes no effect (1 for ratios, 0 for differences), the result is not clear.
p-value (p =)
How likely a result this large would be by chance if there were no real effect. Below 0.05 is usually called a clear result.
Pooled review (meta-analysis)
A study that combines the results of many earlier studies to get one overall answer.
Cohort study
A study that follows a large group of people over years. It shows links, not causes.
BNP
A blood marker of heart strain. Higher means more strain.
LVEF
The share of blood the heart pumps out with each beat.
mmHg
The unit for blood pressure.
Systolic pressure
The top number in a blood pressure reading.
Diastolic pressure
The bottom number in a blood pressure reading.
Marker
A lab or scan result that stands in for a health outcome. A better marker does not always mean better health.

How the short answer is set

Fixed rules turn the studies into the short answer, so the same studies always give the same answer. The rules start from GRADE, a standard system for rating evidence, in plain language.

ConfidenceWhat it means
HighWe are confident the answer is right.
ModerateThe answer is probably right, but it could change.
Low (this page)The answer may well change.
Very lowAny answer is very uncertain.
Not tested in peopleOnly cell or animal studies exist.

Why low here

  • Trials were small, 19 to 188 people, and lasted days to weeks.
  • Blood pressure results disagree across trials and pooled reviews.
  • Death links come from one cohort of Finnish men: links, not causes.
  • More frequent sauna use tracked with lower risk, a dose-response pattern.

Hard limit used. No randomized trial in these papers counted heart attacks or deaths, so the death findings show links, not proof that sauna prevents them.

How this page was made

Label

Search
PubMed, Nov 14, 2026. Searches written by Claude Opus 5.5; papers ranked by PubMed
First read of all 41 papers
Claude Sonnet
Independent second read
Claude Haiku
Disagreements settled by
Claude Opus 5.5
Page text written by
Claude Opus 5.5
Charts
Drawn by code from the study records
Source check by a person
Not yet. Required before search engines may list this page.
Expert review
No
Papers read in full
0 of 41; all from PubMed abstracts
Method
v0.2, created Nov 14, 2026
193numbers in the two reads checked against the abstracts. 3 were not found as written and were fixed.
23key numbers on this page checked again against the papers they cite. All were found.
16 / 41papers where both reads agreed on all ten checked fields.
15fields corrected by the reviewer after reading the abstract.

Search. We ran four PubMed searches for sauna bathing and heart disease, blood pressure and death: pooled and systematic reviews since 2012 (10 of 12), trials in people (22 of 73), population studies (10 of 21). The first number is how many papers we read; the second is how many PubMed found. We took the ones PubMed ranks as most relevant. See the full PubMed search. Of the 41 papers read, 21 were on topic.

Limits. Digestery reads at most about 60 papers per question, so large fields are sampled, not covered in full. Abstracts can leave out key details, such as side effects and funding.

Review queue

These items wait for a person. Search engines are asked not to list the page until the first one is done.

  1. OpenThe short answer is new. It waits for a source check by a person.
  2. OpenOne Finnish Kuopio cohort: Laukkanen 2015, Zaccardi 2017, Kunutsor 2022, Kunutsor 2024 (plus off-topic Laukkanen 2017, Kunutsor 2018). Counted once as evidence.
  3. OpenKunutsor 2022 and Kunutsor 2024 share 2575 men and 1618 deaths; HR 0.86 and 1.16 look like the same comparison reversed.
  4. OpenWAON-CHF trial: Ichiki 2017 is a subanalysis of Tei 2016 (UMIN000006705). Counted once.
  5. OpenLee 2025 (heart rate variability, set off-topic) appears to be the same trial as Lee 2022; analyzed numbers differ (38 vs 47).
  6. OpenYe 2020 reports 31.3% fewer heart deaths and rehospitalizations in 65 patients; this may be Kihara 2009's data. Check before counting separately.
  7. OpenKihara 2009, Kuwahata 2011 and Fujita 2011 cite the authors' own earlier Waon work; check for shared patients and device ties.
  8. OpenTei 2016 abstract contradicts itself on BNP (improved vs not significant); check the full text.
  9. OpenKaiser 2025 (null blood pressure trial) set off-topic because heat type is not in the abstract; include it if it used sauna.
  10. OpenPizzey 2021 and Ye 2020 pool heat therapy generally; abstracts do not say how many studies used sauna.
  11. OpenRocha Conceição 2018, a Waon heart failure systematic review letter, has no abstract; marked relevant but unused.
  12. OpenKunutsor 2018 (stroke, Kuopio cohort) set off-topic because stroke is not heart disease; reconsider if stroke should count.
  13. OpenKihara 2009 is a matched, non-randomized comparison; Miyata 2008 calls itself case-control but says patients were randomized.
  14. OpenNine of 10 relevant trial papers have no conflict-of-interest statement in PubMed.

Page history

DateChangeReason
Nov 14, 2026Page created from 41 papers.First version of the page.

Flag an error

A flag must point to a source: the passage in the paper, or a link to a study this page missed. A flag starts a new check. Votes never change a page.