Pooled review (meta-analysis)
Original title: Effects of Urolithin A supplementation on muscle health outcomes in humans from randomized controlled trials.
No difference
Pooling two trials for the 6-minute walk gave +17.03 m (95% CI -5.33 to 39.40 m; p = 0.135), low certainty. Strength, endurance and marker results were not pooled and called exploratory.
✓ Strength– Limit• Note
These points come from fixed rules about the type of study, its size and length, what it measured, and who has a stake. Every study on Digestery gets the same rules.
This paper is not on the ladder. It is a pooled review (meta-analysis), and reviews and opinion pieces discuss studies that are already counted on the steps below.
↑ Stronger evidence
Not done yet. This is the step that would answer the question.
None among the papers we read.
None among the papers we read.
None among the papers we read.
↓ Weaker evidence
The short answer to “Does urolithin A improve muscle health with age?”
Unclear: small trials, mixed results.
Confidence: very low. Based on 9 on-topic papers.
Read the full answerSpot an error? Email a flag with a link to your source, or use the form on the question page.