Digestery
Lifestyle practices › Strength Training and Lifespan › Studies

Population study: followed a group

In 47,538 adults with type 2 diabetes, strength activity went with lower death risk

Wei and colleagues · Diabetes & metabolic syndrome · 2024

Original title: Association of aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among adults with type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort of US adults.

Under review. A person has not yet checked this summary against the paper. It is written from the PubMed abstract. Until a person checks it, search engines are asked not to list this page.

What the study found

Points to benefit

Meeting the muscle-strengthening guideline gave similar benefits to the moderate-activity guideline (HR 0.72 for moderate, 150-299 min/week). Lowest all-cause death was with 75-150 min/week vigorous activity plus 1 time/week of muscle strengthening (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.70).

The study at a glance

Type of study
Population study: followed a group
Who or what was studied
47,538 people · US adults with type 2 diabetes (47,538) in a national survey, plus 561,963 without diabetes
What was tested
Moderate, vigorous and muscle-strengthening activity, alone and together, linked to death
What it measured
The question itself: death from any cause and healthy aging
Who has a stake
No stake declared
No competing interests declared.
Journal
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome, 2024
Source
PubMed record 38492549. This page is based on the abstract only.

How much this study counts

  • –Shows a link, not a cause: people chose their own habits, and other differences between them may explain the result.
  • ✓Followed people over time, so habits were recorded before the outcome happened.
  • ✓Large: 47,538 people.
  • ✓Measured the question itself: death from any cause and healthy aging.
  • ✓No competing interests declared.
  • •Summarized from the PubMed abstract only. The full paper may hold details the abstract leaves out.

✓ Strength– Limit• Note

These points come from fixed rules about the type of study, its size and length, what it measured, and who has a stake. Every study on Digestery gets the same rules.

Where this study sits

Each dot is one on-topic paper on this question. Steps near the top answer the question more directly.

↑ Stronger evidence

  1. Trials in people: death and healthy aging

    0

    Not done yet. This is the step that would answer the question.

  2. Trials in people: other measures

    9

    7 benefit, 2 no difference

  3. Trials in people: lab tests or safety

    0

    None among the papers we read.

  4. Population studies

    9

    8 benefit, 1 mixed

    ↑ This study is the ringed dot

  5. Blood levels and genes

    0

    None among the papers we read.

↓ Weaker evidence

  • Points to benefit
  • Mixed
  • No difference
  • No direction
  • Points to harm

How it fits with the other research

The short answer to “Does strength training help you live longer?”

Linked to longer life; not proven.

Confidence: low. Based on 26 on-topic papers.

Read the full answer

Of the other 8 papers on the same step: 7 benefit, 1 mixed. This one found benefit. It agrees with most of them.

Other papers on the same step

See all 26 studies on this question

How this page was made

Label

First read of the abstract
Claude Sonnet
Independent second read
Claude Haiku
Differences settled
The two reads agreed on every checked field. Claude Opus 5.5.
Headline
Claude Sonnet, from the checked study record. A script checked its numbers and wording.
Numbers
Checked against the abstract by a script
“How much this study counts”
Fixed rules, the same for every study
Source check by a person
Not yet. Required before search engines may list this page.

Spot an error? Email a flag with a link to your source, or use the form on the question page.